Tuesday 31 March 2015

You can't believe everything you read

I recently acquired a pile of old bridge magazines, and came across this hand in a report by Pietro Forquet on the Italian Team Championships, in The Bridge World for July 1968:
E-W game
Dealer South
  • 106
  • 107
  • AK7654
  • 976
N
W
E
S
  • A5
  • AKQJ2
  • Q
  • QJ1054
West
North
East
South
 
Walter
 
Giorgio
 
 
 
1Roman
1
Xvalues
Pass
2canape
2
Pass
Pass
35 clubs
Pass
4
Pass
45 hearts
All pass


At the other table North cashed his nine top tricks in 3NT, but at this table 4 went off. Forquet notes that "West led the king of spades and Giorgio could not make the contract since the 4-2 trump split didn't give him time to establish the clubs", but that 5 could have been made. 4 is a better contract than Forquet acknowledges, but can't be made because East has four hearts and a diamond singleton — what's the best (but failing) line? And how should 5 be made on the same lead?

Click here to show (or hide) the answer

Thursday 12 March 2015

Bad slam

Love all
Dealer West
  • AKQJ106
  • 10985
  • 65
  • 3
N
W
E
S
  • 9854
  • A72
  • AQ
  • AK102
West
North
East
South
Simon
Jon
Verity
Paul
Pass
1
Pass
2NTraise
Pass
4
Pass
6
All pass


You find yourself in 6 on this hand, and thank your partner warmly enough, reflecting that if you were 6241 you'd be taking the diamond finesse for an overtrick instead of in a near-hopeless position, and that while your 4 jump suggested good spades, you might have had a little something outside. The opening lead is 2, right-hand opponent playing the seven. How do you proceed?

Click here to show (or hide) the answer